AI Mock Interview

For jobseekers, employment advisers and pre-employment training teams, this project divides interview preparation into background review, question confirmation, answers and report review. Users can enter or adjust the role description, responsibilities and requirements alongside personal experience, skills and training, then prepare questions at a chosen difficulty. Practice is grounded in the target role and the person's experience rather than a context-free question list.

Prepare questions that fit

• Practice topics: Questions cover background and motivation, relevant experience, handling situations, communication and teamwork, and stability and growth.
• Questions and spoken delivery: Before the interview, question wording can be reviewed and edited to suit the participant. The reading voice and speed can also be adjusted.

This supports adviser-led preparation: align the questions with the role, then let the jobseeker organise answers independently.

Answer and develop each response

1. Review the question: During practice, participants can read the question or hear it spoken.
2. Submit an answer: They can type an answer or dictate it, review the transcription and submit it.
3. Add detail when needed: Where an answer needs more explanation, the flow can ask a follow-up so the participant can add examples, actions or outcomes. Clearly off-topic answers can prompt another attempt rather than immediately producing only an overall score.

Review feedback and resume practice

The completed report includes an overall comment, strengths, areas to improve and suggestions for the next practice session. Question-level review retains the original question, scoring reasons and improvement advice. A radar chart supports discussion of relevance, examples, responsiveness to the question, clarity and attitude. Jobseekers can identify experiences or wording to reorganise, while advisers can tie feedback to particular answers instead of discussing only a score.

At entry points that support record recovery, interrupted practice can continue within the permitted limits using saved answers and current progress. The project remains positioned as a proof of concept for simulated practice. Reports support self-review and coaching discussions; scores are not hiring decisions, candidate-screening conclusions or certification of professional ability.